Document-Id: 925000, Please cite as: "http://www.trans-lex.org/925000"

Principle

No. IV.5.3 - Interpretation in favour of effectiveness of contract

Where there is doubt about the meaning of a contract term, an interpretation should be preferred that makes the contract lawful or effective ("ut res magis valeat quam pereat"; "effet utile").

CommentaryReferencesContract ClausesDiscussion

Commentary

1 This principle follows from the general principle of interpretation pursuant to which contract interpretation must always seek to determine the common intentions of the parties.

2 The assumption behind that Principle is that each contract is aimed at achieving the parties' common commercial objective. Therefore, contract interpretation of terms which convey different meanings and of which one renders the terms redundant or even absurd or the contract invalid, should always focus on that meaning of the contractual terminology which gives a certain effect to the words or validity to the contract as a whole. Another consequence of this rule is that in interpreting a contract, a solution should always be found that avoides the premature termination of the contract by one side, thus making the avoidance of the contract a remedy of last resort.

Please cite as: "Commentary to Trans-Lex Principle , http://www.trans-lex.org/925000"
 

References

 

Jump to: Please select a type!

Arbitral AwardsCourt DecisionsDoctrineModel LawsNational LegislationPrinciples / Restatements

Arbitral Awards

Ad Hoc-Award of May 27, 1991, YCA 1992, at 11 et seq.Ad-Hoc-Award, Kuwait v. The American Independent Oil Company (AMINOIL), 21 ILM 976ICC Award No. 3243, Clunet 1982, at 968 et seq.ICC Award No. 3380, YCA 1982, at 116 et seq. (also published in: Clunet 1981, at 928 et seq.).ICC Award No. 3460, Clunet 1981, at 939 et seq.ICC Award No. 7920, YCA 1998, at 80 et seq.ICC Award No. 8331, 10 ICC Bull. No. 2, 1999, at 65 et seq. (also published in: Clunet 1998, 1041)ICC Award No. 8365, Clunet 1997, at 1078 et seq.ICC Award No.1434, Clunet 1976, at 978 et seq.ICSID Award, AMCO Asia Corp. et al. v. The Republic of Indonesia et al., YCA 1985, at 61 et seq.ICSID Award, Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. v. The Republic of Sri Lanka, YCA 1991, at 106 et seq.The Government of the State of Kuwait v. The American Independent Oil Company (AMINOIL), YCA 1984, at 71 et seq. 

Court Decisions

Acquisition of Polish Nationality, P.C.I.J. Ser. B, No. 7Antonio Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobouno, Petitioners, v. Sherason Lehman Hutton, Inc. et al., 115 S.Ct. 1212 (1995)BGH NJW 1993, at 1925BGH NJW 1998, 2966BGH NJW 2005, 2618BGH NJW-RR 1990, at 817 et seq.BGH, NJW 1999, 3704British-American Insurance (Kenya) Ltd v Matelec Dal & Anor, [2013] EWHC 3278 (Comm) (29 October 2013)Energy Transport Ltd. v. M.V. San Sebastian, 348 F Suppl. 2d 186Interpretation of Peace Treaties, ICJ Rep. 1950, at 221 et seq.Shaw Group Inc. v Triplefine International Corporation, 322 F.3d 115.Svenska Petroleum Exploration AB (Schweden) vs. Government of the Republic of Lithuania & AB Geonafta (Lithuania), in: Yearbook Comm. Arb'n XXXI (2006), at 906 et seq. 

Doctrine

Berger, Klaus Peter, The Creeping Codification of the Lex Mercatoria, The Hague, London, Boston 1999Berger, The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoriam 2nd. ed. 2010Black, Henry Campell, Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., St. Paul 1990Bonell, Michael Joachim, The UNIDROIT Initiative for the Progressive Codification of International Trade Law, 27 ICLQ 1978, at 413 et seq.Craig, W. Laurence/ Park, William W./ Paulsson, Jan, International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, 3rd ed., Dobbs Ferry 2000Dasser, Felix, Internationale Schiedsgerichte und Lex Mercatoria, Zürich 1989Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 3243, Clunet 1982, at 970 et seq.Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 3380, Clunet 1981, at 930 et seq.Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 8331, Clunet 1998, at 1044 et seq.Ferrari, Franco, The CISG's Interpretative Goals, Its Interpretative Method and Its General Principles in Case Law (Part II), IHR 5/2013, at 181 et seq.Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (edited by Emmanuel Gaillard and John Savage) The Hague 1999Fouchard, Philippe, L'Arbitrage Commercial International, Paris 1965Hartkamp, Arthur, The UNIDROIT Principles for International Commercial Contracts and the New Dutch Civil Code, in: CJHB Brunner-Bundel, Deventer 1994, at 127 et seq.James, Philip, Introduction to English Law., 10th ed., London 1979Kahn, Philippe, L’interpretation des contrats internationaux, 108 Clunet 1981, at 5 et seq.Knütel, Rolf, Rechtseinheit in Europa und römisches Recht, 3 ZEuP 1994, at 244 et seq.Lewison, Kim, The Interpretation of Contracts, 2nd. Ed., London 1997Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Lex Mercatoria: An Arbitrator's View, Arb.Int’l 1990, at 133 et seq.Marrella, Fabrizio, La nuova lex mercatoria, Principi Unidroit ed usi di contratti des comercio internazionale, CEDAM, Tratto di dritto commerciale e di dritto publico dell‘economia, Volume 30, Padova 2003Maskow, Dietrich, Beispiel für allgemeine vertragsrechtliche Regeln, in: Ak.St.Rwiss.DDR (ed.), Grundzüge einer wissenschaftlichen Konzeption des allgemeinen Teils der rechtlichen Regelung internationaler Wirtschaftsbeziehungen zwischen den Organisationen der Mitgliedsländer des RGW, Potsdam-Babelsberg 1986, at 38 et seq.Mustill, Michael, The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-five Years, Arb.Int'l 1988, at 86 et seq.Noy, William, A Treatise of the Principal Grounds and Maxims with an Analysis of the Laws of England, 1821Paulsson, Jan, La Lex Mercatoria dans l‘Arbitrage C.C.I, Rev.d.Arb. 1990. at 55 et seq.Schmitthoff, Clive, International Trade Usages, Institute of International Business Law And Practice Newsletter, Special Issue, ICC Publ.440,4, Paris 1987 

Model Laws

Code Européen des Contrats - European Contract CodeFranco-Italian Obligation Law 

National Legislation

Civil Code QuébecCzechoslovak International Trade CodeEthiopian Civil CodeFrench Code CivilGIW GDRItalian Codice CivileSpanish Código CivilUnited Arab Emirates Civil Code 1987 

Principles / Restatements

Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) - Outline Edition (2009)
Principles of European Contract Law - PECLUNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 

Contract Clauses

 

Jump to: Please select a type!

1. Interpretation ClauseEmployment Contract
1. Interpretation ClauseEmployment ContractJurisdiction and Severability
All provisions of the Plan and Trust shall be so construed as to render them valid and enforceable in accordance with their intent
2000
 

Discussion

There are currently no discussions.
Contact - Team - Trustees - Disclaimer / Legal information / Privacy - Twitter - Facebook
A project of CENTRAL, University of Cologne. Co-sponsored by Klemens Pleyer Foundation